Posts Tagged ‘review’
Errors
A recent eDiscovery Errors Survey reveals that technology has not solved the challenges posed by electronically stored information (ESI). In fact, technology is at the base of most of the mistakes that are made. Lawyers and litigation support professionals were the subject of the survey to identify areas where their organizations experienced the most pain in terms of […]
Filed under: Discovery Services, Document Review, e-discovery, Electronic Discovery | 1 Comment
Tags: discovery services, e-discovery, eD, electronic discovery, electronic discovery news, ESI, legal technology, project manager, review, trends
The best strategy for minimizing the expense and the time expended upon a document review is to hire a project manager. A quality qualified project manager is essential to the success of a document review project. In fact, the project manager is the linchpin. Here are some of the tasks that a document review project […]
Filed under: Discovery Services, Document Review, e-discovery, eD, Electronic Discovery, electronic discovery attorney, employment trends, Project Management | 3 Comments
Tags: contract, discovery services, document review, e-discovery, electronic discovery, employment, ESI, project management, Responsive, review, review team, staff attorney, trends
Underneath the cloud, at the base of any electronic discovery project, are contract attorneys. Hopefully, they have been trained and armed with solid, objective criteria to make decisions regarding what is privileged. If they have not, J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc v. McDermott Will & Emery makes it clear that law firms and their vendors will be sued for […]
Filed under: Discovery Services, e-discovery, Electronic Discovery, electronic discovery attorney, employment trends | 1 Comment
Tags: contract, document review, e-discovery, eD, electronic discovery news, ESI, legal technology, mcdermott lawsuit, Privilege Review, project management, review, review team, trends
The Review Process
There are three essential goals in the review process: (1) Do not produce privileged documents, and segregate documents with any privileged information. (2) Review and tag relevant, non-privileged documents for production. (3) Identify “hot” documents pertinent to the narrow the issues of the case.
Filed under: Discovery Services, e-discovery, eD, Uncategorized | Leave a Comment
Tags: dicovery, document review attorney, eD, electronic discovery news, review, trends
